It looks like the print media are finally starting to wake up to the Eason Jordan story. The Washington Times has an editorial this morning entitled "CNN's Line of Fire". (Hat tip: LaShawn Barber) They're asking the same question a lot of bloggers have been asking: if there is any evidence to support Mr. Jordan's remarks then he should present it. If the remarks are false then why does CNN continue to stand behind him?
Will any other media outlets begin to cover this story? We'll just have to wait and see.